|
Arguments
|
Counter-arguments
|
|
1. Crime
rates are not lower in countries in which death penalty is used.
2. The
capital punishment is usually applied to those who can't afford good legal
counsel.
3. Death
penalty provokes an irreversible damage.
4. Death
penalty against human rights not only because it violates the right to life
but also because the waiting time tortures people psychologically.
5. Human
rights draw a line between what is ethical and what is not.
6. Revange
or justice cannot justify the violation of the accused's human rights.
7. Those
in favour of death penalty can also be considered as murderers.
|
1. Crime
rates can be reduced if death penalty as a punishment.
2. Rich
people have been submitted to the capital punishment as well.
3. The
death penalty implies an economical advantage.
4.
5. The
person who kills crosses the ethic line.
|
miércoles, 30 de septiembre de 2015
8 - Jeremy Irons against death penalty
Key concepts and phrases: crime rates, capital punishment, human rights, the right to life is inallienable, torture, legal counsel, economical disadvantage, those without the mony get the punishment.
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario